Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tri‑Valley presents interim I‑Ready results showing strong short‑term gains and recommends wider rollout
Summary
District presenters told the board that interim I‑Ready assessments across a roughly 55‑day window showed substantial gains—elementary math on‑or‑above grade‑level rose from ~17% to 34% and students two or more grades below fell sharply—and recommended continuing the I‑Ready program with MTSS supports and selected pilots.
District staff presented interim I‑Ready assessment results to the board showing rapid short‑term gains and described next steps for interventions and program rollout.
Presenters said the assessment window spans roughly 55 school days (from the first testing window in fall through the second window in November) and highlighted improvements concentrated in lower‑performing groups. "We essentially doubled our proficiency level in 55 days while decreasing by 44% our kids that are two or more grade levels below," a district presenter said, noting that some percentage changes are large because of small base rates in certain cohorts.
Staff detailed subject‑specific patterns: elementary math on‑or‑above grade‑level rose from about 17% to 34% in the interim window; ELA gains were also reported (presenters cited a ~71% improvement in one ELA metric), and secondary math cohorts more than doubled on certain measures after adding MTSS‑style intervention periods. Presenters credited targeted tier‑one instruction, the use of MTSS intervention blocks and a new second‑grade math pilot as contributors to early gains.
Board members asked how representative the short window was for long‑term outcomes and raised concerns about sixth‑grade dips; presenters responded that the 55‑day snapshot can show meaningful growth for students with larger room to improve and described plans to use supplemental disciplinary reading time and targeted AI practice tools to support older grades. Presenters cautioned that final spring assessments will give a fuller picture.
The district also noted that the I‑Ready program was offered at a discounted rate for implementation and that teacher feedback has been positive in pilot classrooms. Next steps include review of the final spring I‑Ready pull in May, continued MTSS meeting referrals, and staff follow‑up on grade‑level interventions.
What this means: The data presented were interim and short‑term; district staff emphasized that the numbers reflect an early window of instruction and should be interpreted in that context. The board may seek more detailed reporting at future meetings.
