Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Councilors and residents split over proposal to allow leashed dogs in Woodland Cemetery

Keene Municipal Services, Facilities & Infrastructure Committee · April 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilor Bobby Williams asked the MSFI committee to consider a one‑year trial allowing leashed dogs in Woodland Cemetery to increase foot traffic and deter illicit activity; parks staff and many residents raised preservation, sanitation, enforcement and cultural concerns. The committee accepted the item as informational.

Councilor Bobby Williams proposed allowing leashed dogs in Woodland Cemetery under a one‑year trial ordinance, arguing that increased foot traffic could deter illicit activity and make the space safer for neighbors.

"If we could create some guard rails around having dogs in the park, I think maybe some of Mr. Bohannan's concerns would be mitigated," Williams said as he outlined a trial with leash and cleanup requirements.

City staff and many residents voiced concerns. Parks staff cited guidance from the National Park Service’s historic preservation division that repeated exposure to dog urine can erode marble and limestone markers, leading to staining and long‑term damage. Parks Director Carus Kenny said cemeteries are the only public space in Keene currently exempt from dogs and warned of enforcement and litter issues: "Improperly discarded waste bags are already a recurring problem…and would likely appear in cemeteries as well," she said.

Deputy City Manager Andy Bohan emphasized the cemetery’s status as a place of remembrance and the potential for confrontation when staff approach dog owners. Several public commenters and some councilors said they valued increased foot traffic for safety but remained concerned about disrespect to gravesites and enforcement practicality.

After substantial public testimony for and against the idea, the committee moved to accept the request for consideration as informational, so the council can consider next steps; a one‑year sunset clause or narrower enforcement options were discussed but no ordinance change was adopted at the meeting.

What happens next: staff indicated they would consult with the city attorney and consider enforcement and trial‑design options, and the council may take up a formal ordinance change after further study and public input.