Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs $749,984 courthouse lighting plan; security need and grant options debated
Summary
County staff and a contractor presented a $749,984.37 proposal to add hidden track-style LED lighting to the historic courthouse for security and aesthetic use. Commissioners debated staging a lower-level security phase versus doing both levels at once and asked staff to explore grants before committing.
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Building and Grounds Director Booker Boyer and contractor Kylie Hall presented a proposal to add exterior accent and security lighting to the historic Lincoln County courthouse. The detailed, track-style LED plan — bid at a not-to-exceed $749,984.37 — would install two tiers of lighting hidden in a channel under the building lip to provide sidewalk illumination and architectural accenting.
Boyer said the original impetus for the effort was security: employees leaving the building after dark have reported uncomfortable encounters and poor sidewalk visibility. Hall explained the system would be protected from direct water exposure and could be controlled via a tablet or phone; the materials and RGB-capable fixtures accounted for the bulk of the cost. Hall noted manufacturers and supply houses provided higher quotes for comparable fixtures and said the contractor offers a five-year warranty on the components.
Commissioners expressed “sticker shock” at the price and debated whether the county should stage the work by completing the south-side/lower-level security lighting first and defer the upper-level architectural lighting. Concerns included potential damage to historic stone if fasteners are used, the cost of boom-lift rentals for upper-tier work, and the possibility that inflation would raise future costs if the board phases the project.
Several commissioners asked staff to pursue grant opportunities (historic preservation or community-improvement funds) before taking action. For now the board did not vote to approve the full project; members signaled support for researching outside funding and for considering a limited, security-focused phase as an interim step.
What’s next: staff and the contractor will look into grant programs and the feasibility and price differential of a phased approach; the board requested a one-week check-in on funding options and timeline implications.

