Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nuisance Abatement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public complaints prompt removal of several nuisance-abatement items from consent agenda

Kern County Board of Supervisors · April 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After several residents described alleged improper abatement and squatter problems, Public Works asked to remove specific properties from the consent agenda so staff can work directly with property owners; the board approved the consent docket with those exceptions.

The Kern County Board of Supervisors removed several nuisance-abatement properties from today’s consent agenda after residents described active disputes and asked staff for more time to resolve them.

Public commenter Miguel Ayon said he had cleaned up a Lake Isabella property only to find squatters and an on-site motorhome returned within days. “It’s becoming ... it’s horrible. It’s a nightmare with these people up there,” Ayon said while offering photos and an audio voicemail. Public Works Director Joshua Champion told the board the county treats these matters as property issues and recommended removing the parcel from the consent listing to allow staff to work with Ayon on a mutually beneficial solution. Staff withdrew the parcel and read a revised total into the record.

Other speakers, including Lisa Wilson Powell of Arvin and Danielle Milton of Tehachapi, described separate abatement or towing actions they said harmed their property and requested follow-up from county staff. Public Works acknowledged those concerns and recommended removing the associated consent items so staff could confer with the residents before returning with a resolution.

The board voted to approve the consent agenda with the listed exceptions; the meeting record shows the motion carried with all ayes. The clerk’s tally as announced during the meeting reflected a revised consent total after the removals.

Next steps: staff will engage individually with the affected property owners and return any unresolved matters to the board at a later date.