Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cemetery Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews proposed cemetery ordinance changes to clarify burial rights and maintenance authority

Newman City Council · May 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff summarized proposed revisions to the cemetery ordinance including written-permission requirements for burials, clearer rules for who has the right of interment, authority for the cemetery superintendent to require maintenance, adjusted headstone-size rules, and guidance on multiple interments; council asked for clearer language and staff plans to return the ordinance for consideration.

City staff summarized proposed revisions to the Newman City cemetery ordinance based on the recently completed cemetery master plan and asked council for input before returning a revised ordinance for formal consideration.

Staff said one proposed change would require written permission when someone without a property interest claims a right to be buried in a lot, and would give the cemetery superintendent authority to require lot owners to keep trees, bushes and shrubs trimmed rather than bringing each issue to council. Staff also said the draft clarifies the "right of interment" — including an example that, in disputed family-plot situations, the firstborn would be entitled — and would add rules permitting certain secondary interments, such as cremated remains placed in an existing grave when appropriate.

The draft also proposes standardizing headstone-size rules across active city cemeteries so areas such as Eastview and Oak Hill follow the same policy, while giving flexibility for larger family markers when lot size allows.

Council members pressed staff to clarify language on lot configuration and headstone eligibility, noting several existing family plots do not match the layout described in the draft and asking staff to avoid unintentionally disallowing previously permitted arrangements. Staff said the goal was administrative clarity and ease of enforcement and indicated plans to return a revised ordinance for consideration at the next meeting.

No final action was taken at this meeting; staff will incorporate council feedback and bring a formal ordinance to a future agenda.