Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Equity Inclusion topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Petaluma board directs Progress Pride flag flown at schools each school day, allows other flags in addition

Petaluma City Schools Board of Education · April 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After months of public comment, the Petaluma City Schools Board voted to direct all district sites to fly the Progress Pride flag each school day, amending the resolution to allow other board‑authorized symbolic flags to be flown in addition; trustees asked staff for implementation guidance on logistics and half‑mast protocols.

The Petaluma City Schools Board of Education voted to direct all district sites to fly the Progress Pride flag each school day while allowing other board‑authorized symbolic flags to be flown in addition, a move trustees said is intended to make support for LGBTQIA+ students visible and consistent across the district.

Trustee Caitlin Quinn, who led the resolution’s push after meetings with student board members and community members, said the change was aimed at providing “the clearest, most consistent expression of support for LGBTQIA+ students, staff and families” across the district. The board amended the original language to permit other symbolic flags to be displayed in addition to the Progress Pride flag, rather than in its place, after trustees raised concerns about recognizing other marginalized communities simultaneously.

Student and staff speakers framed the vote as a safety measure. "If I got to see the flag at my school throughout the year, I would know that for certain that the school was on my side," said Sage Kelly Kusumano, a Grant Elementary sixth grader, arguing that a year‑round flag would signal acceptance for students who cannot be publicly out. Several high‑school students and GSA advisors said the flag can reduce harm and increase the sense of belonging that supports student learning.

Board members also asked administration to prepare an administrative regulation (AR) detailing implementation steps: how many flags can be flown at each site, flag sizes, spacing, and procedures for half‑mast orders so commemorative flags do not inadvertently touch the ground. Trustee Ryan Webster and others suggested the district explore options (additional poles, smaller ceremonial flags) to allow Juneteenth or other community flags to be flown without supplanting Pride visibility.

The motion passed following an amendment replacing language that would have allowed other flags "in place of" the Progress Pride flag with wording that permits them "in addition to" the Progress Pride flag. Trustees said the board will return with an AR addressing logistics and procedures.

The board also affirmed June as LGBTQIA+ Pride Month and October as LGBTQIA+ History Month in the resolution; trustees and student leaders said both months have distinct educational and community value. The resolution passed by majority vote.

What happens next: district staff will draft the AR that lays out flagpole logistics, an approach for half‑mast protocols and guidance for sites on temporary flag requests. Trustees indicated they expect the AR to balance visibility for multiple communities and practical constraints at school sites.