Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Code Fines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Roselle staff outline sweeping overhaul of fines, fees and adjudication under home-rule authority
Summary
Village staff presented a consolidated 'fine table' and other code updates that would raise many minimum fines, transfer adjudication to village hearings, and increase impound and administrative penalties; trustees discussed specific increases but full ordinance language was not yet adopted.
Village staff and the board discussed a broad modernization of Roselle’s fines, fees and impoundment policies at the April 27 meeting, with staff saying the changes align the municipal code with home-rule authority and state law.
DC Gates and village attorneys presented the reorganization: consolidating penalty amounts into a single fine table so the village can update fines centrally rather than amending many separate ordinances. Staff said many penalties had not been updated since about 2010 and argued modest increases would improve deterrence for nuisance and safety-related violations.
Proposed or discussed changes cited in the presentation include raising the minimum fine in the fine table (example: $35 to $50), increasing tobacco-sale penalties (first-offense business penalties discussed up to $400), noise and nuisance penalties, and must-appear offense fines (examples discussed moving some levels from $250 to $400). Traffic-related changes include renaming alternative compliance tickets to 'compliance violation citations' and moving unsettled citations to local administrative adjudication rather than the circuit clerk. Staff also proposed raising the municipal impound fee (noted as $500 in code) with an initial recommendation of $750 and trustee support for $1,000 for severe offenses such as DUI or fleeing and eluding.
Trustees discussed enforcement goals and fairness: some members said higher fines can deter repeat noncompliance (for example, people choosing to pay a small fine rather than store an RV properly), while others asked for clearer public messaging so residents understand new penalties before enforcement is stepped up. Staff said education would precede enforcement and that the village’s home-rule authority allows an administrative cap as high as $50,000 for rare, extreme cases.
No final ordinance text was adopted at the meeting; staff said they would return with draft ordinance language and implementation details, including outreach and revised fine tables.
