Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy Override topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident challenges timing of 2% tax-cap override; council says local law will be tabled pending hearing
Summary
Residents and speakers argued that a local law to override New York State’s 2% property tax cap requires a separate public hearing; council members said the local law, if read tonight, would be automatically tabled and a hearing scheduled unless the mayor provided a letter of necessity.
Residents and members of the public pressed the council over the process for a proposed local law to override New York State’s 2% property tax cap, arguing the city must hold a separate public hearing before adopting such a local law.
One speaker, identifying research with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, asked: "Does a city in New York State need to hold a public hearing to override the 2% tax cap? Their answer? Yes." The speaker said the department told him a public hearing is required because an override requires adoption of a local law and local laws follow the standard notice and public-hearing procedures.
Speakers argued that reading and immediately voting on an override would short-circuit public debate and that previous overrides may have lacked proper hearings. One commenter urged the council to give Jamestown residents time to understand and debate the issue, including the option of a referendum.
Council members responded that local laws are automatically tabled for 30 days unless the mayor issues a letter of necessity. Council staff later cited prior dates for local-law hearings related to the tax cap in 2024 and 2025, and members explained that municipalities have differing budget calendars; Jamestown’s budget schedule typically leads to a November budget season. Council indicated that, procedurally, a public hearing will be scheduled before any final action on the local law.
No final vote on an override occurred at this meeting; council members affirmed they would follow the required notice and hearing procedures before any local-law adoption.
