Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Infrastructure committee OKs consent package, including museum masonry contract and vehicle purchases

West Chicago Infrastructure Committee · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The West Chicago Infrastructure Committee approved a consent package covering vehicle and equipment purchases, a wastewater change order and a masonry rehabilitation contract for the West Chicago Museum at 132 Main Street. Two consent items were pulled for discussion and handled separately.

The West Chicago Infrastructure Committee on May 7 approved a consent package that included vehicle and equipment purchases, a change order on a wastewater phosphorus-removal project and a masonry rehabilitation contract for the West Chicago Museum at 132 Main Street.

A committee member moved to approve the consent items a through e, g and h and read key details aloud, including a change order for a Ford step-van body (a revision not to exceed $8,500 that brings a contract total to $170,018), purchase of a 2026 Freightliner sewer-cleaning truck, a road-salt purchase for the 2026–27 season, disposal of surplus equipment, and a credit of $11,447 that yields a final contract amount not to exceed $5,109,353 for the A2O phosphorus removal work at the West Chicago Windfield Wastewater Authority regional wastewater treatment plant. The committee also approved a janitorial-services contract amendment and awarded the museum masonry rehabilitation base bid, with alternates rejected, at 132 Main Street.

After the clerk called the roll, members voted to approve the consent package. Two items (4f and 4i) were pulled for separate discussion and action; those items were handled later in the meeting.

The committee did not provide additional details about the funding sources for each consent contract in the discussion; the meeting packet presumably contains the contract documents and funding breakdowns.