Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Affairs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates value of GNRC/TML membership, lobbyist spending and RTA dues
Summary
Committee members questioned repeated GNRC/TML payments, the cost-effectiveness of the current lobbyist arrangement, and the city’s $6,000 RTA dues as staff explained split payments for GNRC memberships, the role GNRC plays in routing federal transportation funds, and options to reduce lobbying costs.
Get email alerts on the Government Affairs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee members used the budget review to scrutinize recurring membership, lobbying, and professional-service expenses, asking staff whether the city gets value from GNRC, TML and its external lobbyist, and whether the $6,000 RTA membership is justified.
On GNRC, staff explained the city receives two invoices (planning and executive) that the city internally splits: one payment covers planning participation and another covers executive membership. "We actually get 1 bill and then we internally split it into 2 different payments," a staff member said, and staff emphasized GNRC’s role in ranking and routing federal transportation funds and in supporting the city’s RTP/TIP submissions.
On TML and lobbying, Mayor Jamie Cleary and several members described TML as useful but noted that the association’s agenda can be influenced by larger cities. The committee discussed a previously proposed reduction to the professional-lobbyist line (about $30,000 in the draft) and whether a lower-cost, more-targeted lobbyist or mayor-led outreach could substitute for a full contract. "At $10,000, we won't have a lobbyist," one member said; staff noted that $50,000 would buy a fuller set of lobbying services.
Regional transit dues: members asked what the city receives for a roughly $6,000 RTA membership fee. Staff said that fee buys board membership and that the city will follow up to confirm direct service levels and the practical implications of canceling membership.
Next steps: staff will report back with clearer breakdowns of what the city receives for GNRC and RTA dues and the committee asked the mayor and staff to consider whether to amend the budget proposal’s professional-services/lobbyist allocation before the Board acts.

