Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the African Meeting House Sign topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sign advisory panel asks Museum of African-American History to revise Nantucket freestanding sign proposal
Summary
The HTC Sign Advisory Council voted May 5 to hold the Museum of African-American History—29 York Street sign application for revisions after members and public commenters raised concerns about color, branding and loss of building-identifying text. The museum said it is willing to amend the design and remove the logo if needed.
Christopher Young, chair of the HTC Sign Advisory Council, opened a lengthy review of a proposed freestanding sign for the Museum of African-American History at 29 York Street and the council ultimately voted to hold the application for revisions.
Marcia Federer, acting as agent for the museum, presented the application and traced the site's signage history, saying the museum'0legal name includes "Museum of African-American History, Boston, Nantucket" and that prior signs had referenced multiple building names. "I'm acting as the agent Marcia Federer for the Museum of African-American History," she told the council and noted the museum had supplied documentation of earlier approvals.
Commissioner Kevin Kuster focused the review on historic continuity and design details. He said the sign should maintain features that link it to an earlier, historically oriented freestanding sign and expressed concern that the proposed branded logo and brighter colors would change the site's character. "This sign is historic just like the building is," Kuster said, urging preservation of moldings, muted colors and typography tied to the original sign.
Public commenter Mary told the council the current design "is now a billboard for an off island organization" and urged the museum to include the names of the individual buildings and clearer local identification rather than only the museum logo.
Dr. Noel Trent, the museum's chief executive, acknowledged the community concerns and said the museum had submitted further revisions for the council's review. "We are open to removing the logo," Dr. Trent said, and the museum proposed alternative building-level identification (quarter signs) as a separate submission to help visitors identify each structure on the property.
The council's discussion centered on three technical issues: whether the existing sign had documented grandfathered status for its historical elements; whether changing colors and adding a prominent institutional logo would set a precedent for other freestanding signs; and whether the sign should list the names of the multiple buildings on the site. Commissioners agreed they needed clearer documentation and a revised design that better reflects the site's historic character.
On a motion from Commissioner Ben Norman, seconded by Paul Wolf, the council voted to hold the application for revisions so the museum can submit clarified plans addressing color palette, edge banding/molding retention, and identification copy. The motion passed with commissioners present voting in the affirmative.
Next steps: the museum intends to refine the submission and return with revised drawings. Staff will confirm whether previous approvals cited in the application establish grandfathered design elements and will place the revised application on a future agenda.
