Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant warns Seward County faces $4.8 million in cuts; commissioners set follow-up budget work session
Summary
An outside consultant told Seward County commissioners at their Jan. 9 work session that spending has risen sharply and the county may need roughly $4.8 million in cuts depending on voter appeals; commissioners asked for detailed benchmarks and scheduled a deeper budget review.
A Kansas Policy Institute consultant told Seward County commissioners at a Jan. 9 work session that local spending has risen far faster than inflation and recommended a detailed, department‑level review to find immediate savings.
Dave Traubart, CEO of the Kansas Policy Institute, said benchmarking across peer counties shows Seward County’s expenditures increased about 42% since 2021 while inflation was roughly 22%. “You look at the areas where you have… you’re way above considerably above what looks like an average of most counties,” Traubart said, urging the commission to target the largest variances first.
The chair of the commission warned that the county may face binding reductions soon. “We have to have $4,800,000 of cuts immediately,” the chair said, citing potential outcomes tied to voter appeals and the Board of Tax Appeals. Commissioners discussed that some fixes would be one‑time transfers or reserve draws and that those steps could worsen future budgets without structural change.
Traubart advised the commission to sort spending into three buckets—discretionary, required-but-optimizable, and mission‑critical—and to test assumptions about costs and mandated services. He recommended the Kansas Association of Counties be asked for statutory references that define which services counties must provide to differentiate legal obligations from discretionary spending.
Staff and commissioners discussed options to free cash tied up in enterprise funds (such as the landfill) but cautioned there are legal and accounting limits on transfers. County staff said some reserve lines are earmarked in the general fund and that moving money into separate special revenue or debt‑service funds would require a budget amendment, republishing and a public hearing.
Commissioners asked for more precise, department‑level sub‑item data and a benchmarking report from the county’s broker and IMA. The commission scheduled a follow-up budget work session to review the final budget and the audit and to give commissioners “a 10,000‑foot overview” ahead of March budget decisions. The session was discussed for Jan. 20 at 4:30 p.m.
