Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers, commissioners debate senior-affordable rezone and binding conditions at Oglethorpe Avenue
Summary
A proposal to dissolve a 2022 Planned Development and rezone 1165 Oglethorpe Avenue to RM‑1 for senior-focused affordable housing prompted discussion about tax-credit financing, age and income covenants, setbacks and emergency access; the planning commission recommended approval with conditions.
Planning staff presented a two-part request on April 21 to dissolve an existing 2022 Planned Development (PD) for 1165 Oglethorpe Avenue and rezone the property from Commercial Neighborhood (CN) to RM‑1. The applicant’s nonbinding concept shows a single multistory structure with a mix of one‑ and two‑bedroom apartments intended for residents 55 and older.
Developer representatives said financing realities prompted the PD dissolution. David Lisonbee, speaking for a Piedmont Housing/Athens Land Trust partnership, said the original PD became financially unviable after changes in interest rates and that the revised RM‑1 concept is intended to provide senior affordable housing and to pursue low-income housing tax credits. "We're looking at unit mixes at 50, 60, 70 percent AMI," Lisonbee said, asking the commission to clarify how planning-commission conditions would be worded in the ordinance.
Planning commission conditions forwarded with the request included: (1) second driveway for emergency access only if required; (2) households limited to 80% AMI for 30 years (the applicant said unit mixes would likely be at 50–70% AMI); (3) resident age limited to 55+ for the first 30 years; and (4) locked-in setbacks indicated on the submitted plan. Commissioners probed enforcement and compliance mechanisms, such as annual reporting to verify affordability covenants, and discussed whether a two- versus three-story building would better fit neighborhood character.
Commissioners and staff also discussed contingencies if tax-credit applications fail. Staff said the conditions would remain on the zoning if adopted and any subsequent developer would have to seek changes from the commission. The applicant said the project would likely remain senior housing with covenants that run with the land and that the developer is open to adjusting building height and buffers in response to neighborhood concerns.
No final vote was taken at the agenda-setting meeting. Commissioners requested further refinement of ordinance language and clarity on covenant enforcement, setback and height implications before the May voting meeting.
