Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Incubate Building topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
FPRA weighs legal, procurement steps to fix roof, HVAC and mold at incubate neighborhood center
Summary
After public comment and staff updates, Fort Pierce redevelopment officials agreed to pursue a legal and procurement path to fund and manage roof and HVAC replacements and mold remediation at the incubate neighborhood center, and to draft a new operating agreement while keeping the tenant relationship intact.
A public commenter told the board the incubate neighborhood center building has leaking roofing and "significant mold intrusion" and called for immediate remediation to protect public safety and restore services.
Staff said it has received the tenant’s response letter, construction schedule and refreshed quotes, and that the amendment to the lease makes the landlord (the FPRA/city) responsible for roof and HVAC work but leaves the procurement vehicle unclear. "We are in possession of a plethora of quotes," staff said, but added the board needs to decide whether the city will reimburse the tenant, pull its own permits or hire contractors directly.
Commissioners pressed for clear control of warranties and long-term maintenance. Commissioner Broderick said roofing and chiller units require manufacturer warranties and coordinated project management, and warned that contractor warranties tied only to a tenant could leave the agency without recourse if the tenant leaves. "We need control of that. That's our asset," Broderick said.
Several commissioners called for parallel steps: obtain updated, competitively solicited specifications and bids; hire or assign a project manager to produce engineering specs for roof and HVAC and oversee procurement; and have legal craft a funding or operating agreement (or a replacement lease) so work can proceed in compliance with procurement rules. Commissioner Gaines urged fairness to the tenant, noting the operator had invested money in the space.
Staff and the board agreed on a course of action: staff will work with legal and purchasing to develop a procurement and funding vehicle, produce project specifications, and return to the board with a recommended agreement and cost estimates. Several commissioners asked for the work to be advanced quickly and for a 30-day cadence of staff/legal coordination. The board indicated it wants to retain a relationship with the current operator but replace the existing lease with a new, clearer document before the tenant reoccupies the building.
The discussion did not include a final vote to obligate construction funds; board members said they expected to receive specific quotes, scope and legal recommendations at a future meeting before any contract or reimbursement was approved.
