Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves a slate of contracts and routine items; several motions pass unanimously
Summary
The White Eagle School District board approved the minutes, consent agenda, awarded multiple exterior painting contracts and an architectural design contract, and approved an HR declaration and a schedule change; most motions carried unanimously by roll call.
At the meeting the board recorded several routine approvals and contract awards in a consolidated voting block.
Adopt regular agenda: Motion by Bruna, seconded by Dr. Ruiz; roll call recorded as "Motion passes, 3 0." (SEG 008–022).
Approval of minutes (04/27/2026): Motion by Dr. Ruiz, seconded by Gomez; roll call 4–0 (SEG 698–713).
Consent agenda: Motion by Bruno, second by Dr. Ruiz; roll call 4–0 (SEG 714–726).
Contract awards and procurement items (all approved by roll call 4–0 unless noted): - Item 9.1: Exterior painting contract recommended to CMA Painting Inc.; lowest bid reported at $391,000. Board questioned large variance in bids; staff noted prevailing wage and job-walk process (SEG 1605–1718). - Item 9.2: Parkview Elementary exterior painting recommended to Innovation Painting (lowest bid $276,000); funded by Measure C bond funds (SEG 1719–1751). - Item 9.3: Consent to withdrawal of Raynack Painting's low bid due to clerical error and award to Pacific Contractors Group for $380,000 for Williams project (SEG 1752–1794). - Item 9.4: Architectural services for gym design at two high schools to Fuell & Moody for $1,586,245 (design-phase contract; not construction) (SEG 1795–1860).
HR and scheduling votes: - Item 10.1: Declaration of need for fully qualified educators for 2026–27 school year as required by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing; motion approved 4–0 (SEG 1861–1903). - Board business: Rescheduling the July 27 regular board meeting to July 20; motion approved 4–0 (SEG 1904–1930).
Board members made brief comments during some motions, particularly questioning the large variance between low and high bids on the painting contracts; staff replied that allowances and differing estimates can explain some variances. No motion failed and no item was tabled.
