Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Apex Credit Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board wrestles with Apex credit-recovery after teachers call it a 'system of cheating'
Summary
Teachers and board members debated tightening oversight of Apex online credit-recovery after classroom teachers said students complete semesters in days; staff proposed higher mastery thresholds, embedded assignments and limits on Apex course loads.
Several teachers and community members pressed Newark Unified on Wednesday to rein in use of Apex, the district's online credit-recovery platform, arguing students can complete semesters with minimal instruction.
In public comment, a teacher who has worked with affected students said Apex "essentially...enables anyone who is not doing well to earn credits" and described cases where students completed a semester's work in a week. That testimony prompted a staff presentation showing district Apex data and a package of recommended changes.
Staff recommendations: District staff presented usage statistics (about 160 students and 167 active Apex courses) and flagged a mismatch between instruction time and assessment time on the platform. Staff recommended: - Set higher mastery standards (proposed 85% for Newark Memorial, 80% for alternative education), - Require completion of embedded instructional assignments and study guides, and - Limit students to a maximum of two Apex courses per year, with district oversight and a named administrator responsible for implementation.
Why it matters: Parents and teachers said Apex had functioned as a "safety valve" that can mask gaps in classroom instruction and inflate graduation rates; staff said strict safeguards are necessary if the district continues to offer Apex, including clear monitoring and semester-by-semester reporting to the board.
Board discussion and concerns: Trustees asked about technical anti-cheating tools and the effect of an immediate policy change on current juniors. Staff and the board discussed phased implementation for different grade cohorts to avoid unfairly changing requirements mid-course for students nearing graduation.
Ending: Board members signaled support for stronger oversight; staff was asked to return with implementation rules, a phase-in plan for cohorts (juniors vs. sophomores/freshmen), and regular reporting on Apex use and outcomes.
