Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Accountability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dorchester School District 2 board hears overhaul of state report-card calculations behind score shifts

Dorchester School District 2 Board of Trustees · October 28, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board received a detailed presentation explaining that changes to South Carolina's report-card formulas — including new student-growth measures and a High School Student Success indicator — largely explain shifts in school and district ratings; district leaders said academic achievement held steady and graduation rates remain high.

The Dorchester School District 2 board on Oct. 28 heard a detailed presentation about newly issued South Carolina school report cards and how changes in state calculations affected local ratings.

A district presenter introduced the new formulas and said the state's reset of the student-growth calculation and the addition of a High School Student Success indicator accounted for most of the district's overall score changes. "This reset of this calculation really was responsible for about 70% of our change in our performance overall," the presenter said, urging trustees to view the year as a baseline under the new rules.

The presenter said six schools in the district earned an overall "excellent" rating, 10 earned "good," seven "average" and two "below average," and no school was rated "unsatisfactory." He said the district's graduation rate remained high at about 89.4% and highlighted a five-year success rate figure that the presenter cited as roughly 93.5%.

Board members pressed for context about the new indicators. The presenter described the student-growth indicator as now composed of three formulas — including criterion-based targets for each student — which makes direct year-to-year comparisons difficult in the reset year. He said some schools might appear to lose points compared with last year even if local performance did not decline in absolute terms.

Superintendent Dr. Robbins framed the changes as a statewide recalibration and said the district still compares favorably with state averages in several academic measures, including algebra gains and certain college- and career-readiness metrics.

Trustees did not take formal action on the report-card data at the meeting; the presentation was offered as the district moves into a year of implementation under the new state calculations. The board's next regular meeting is scheduled for Nov. 11; a called meeting to swear in newly elected trustees was announced for Nov. 21 once the election certification process is complete.