Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council votes to meet in closed session to discuss personnel matter

The council · November 14, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Nov. 14, 2024, the council voted to meet in closed session to consider a personnel matter concerning one or more specific appointees, employees or officials, citing Maryland Code, General Provisions Article §3-305(b)(1). The motion was moved by Council member Lukhi and seconded by Council member Katz; no roll-call tally was recorded in the open session.

The council voted on Nov. 14, 2024, to move into a closed session to consider a personnel matter concerning one or more specific appointees, employees or officials, the presiding chair said.

Pursuant to Maryland Code, General Provisions Article §3-305(b)(1), the chair said the subject met the legal standard for a closed meeting. "Pursuant to Maryland code general provisions article section 3,305 B 1, the topic is a personnel matter concerning 1 or more specific appointees, employees, or officials," the chair stated.

The chair then asked for a motion to move into closed session. "I'll entertain a motion for the council to meet in closed session," the chair said; a motion was made and the chair recorded that it was "moved by Council member Lukhi, seconded by Council member Katz." The chair asked those in favor to indicate by raising their hands, but the open meeting minutes do not record an individual roll-call tally or a numerical vote.

The chair announced the council would meet in the 3rd Floor Council Conference Room for the closed session and declared the open portion of the meeting adjourned. No additional details about the personnel matter, including who would be discussed or any expected actions to follow the closed session, were provided in the open meeting record.

The council did not specify a time to reconvene the open meeting or release further public materials about the closed-session discussion at the time the open session was adjourned.