Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter School Performance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board presses Oglethorpe Charter School on low ELA proficiency despite strong attendance and extracurriculars
Summary
At the April 8 Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education meeting, Oglethorpe Charter School reported high attendance and active extracurricular programs but also low ELA proficiency. Board members asked for specific interventions and alignment to state evaluation metrics ahead of contract renewal reviews.
Oglethorpe Charter School presented its annual report to the Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education on April 8, reporting last year’s GMAS results, a 93.2% average daily attendance rate, and steady operational finances. Board members, however, highlighted the school’s low ELA proficiency and pressed for clearer intervention plans tied to the new state evaluation rubric.
The board meeting heard the school’s presentation from its representative, who summarized test-score comparisons with the district and the state and described nonacademic strengths including expanded related-arts, monthly PBIS events and leadership clubs such as the Titan Ambassadors. The presenter said PBIS implementation has improved positive-to-negative interaction ratios from about 68% to 92% and that the school maintains reserves and multi-year clean audits.
The discussion shifted quickly to student achievement and contract accountability. Dr. Bringman, a board member, reminded the presenter that charter contracts will be judged on objective, state-level metrics and said the data shown do not demonstrate the charter outpacing the district. “Charter schools are supposed to outpace the district,” Dr. Bringman said, and urged the school to show measurable gains before a future renewal decision.
Board members also questioned school leaders about how athletics and extracurricular programming interact with academics. The presenter described a model in which student-athletes attend tutorial sessions before practice and said the approach is designed to preserve academic eligibility and keep students engaged. The school noted it contracts for transportation hubs to extend access to more neighborhoods.
Board members requested that future charter presentations include the district’s evaluation/renewal form and explicit intervention plans tied to low-performing areas — in particular ELA. The presenter described remediation strategies that occur during related-arts periods and pull-outs for special education students but did not provide a single, board-approved intervention rubric during this presentation.
The board’s questions also probed student intake and retention: the presenter said incoming sixth-graders often arrive behind grade level (he estimated roughly 60% at least one year behind) and that most students remain at the charter for three years unless they move or are removed for behavior. Board members said baseline intake information is necessary context for judging outcomes against district or state metrics.
The meeting record shows no formal action on the Oglethorpe report; board members concluded the exchange by asking the school to return with data aligned to the evaluation instrument the board will use for renewals.
