Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Executive Session topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board votes to hold closed meeting on litigation and personnel matters
Summary
The SSD Board of Education voted unanimously at its July 8 special meeting to hold a closed session to discuss litigation, privileged attorney communications and personnel records, citing statutory exceptions for executive sessions.
The SSD Board of Education voted to hold a closed meeting on Tuesday, July 8 to discuss legal actions, privileged communications with the district's attorneys, and personnel matters including hiring, firing, disciplining or promoting employees and individually identifiable personnel records and performance ratings.
The board president called the special meeting to order and asked for a roll call to establish a quorum. After a member moved and another seconded a motion "to hold a closed meeting of the board of education on Tuesday, July 8th, regarding legal actions, causes of action, or litigation involving the district and any confidential ... privileged communication between the district or its representatives and its attorneys," the board cited statutory references on the record (transcript cites: "610.0211," "6.10.0213," and "610.02113").
Directors recorded their votes in a roll call. Director Suda, Director Nelson, Director Beaver, Director Asner (recorded in transcript also as "Azner"), Director Storius (recorded also as "Sartorius"), Vice President Coonio, and the board president each answered "Yes," and the president announced that "the motion to approve holding a closed meeting of the board of education carries." The board then adjourned the public meeting.
The motion as recorded is procedural and authorizes a closed session under the cited statutory exceptions; no substantive decisions about litigation or personnel were announced in the public record. After adjournment, a participant asked if members needed to log off to proceed into the closed session, a procedural matter noted at the end of the public meeting.
The transcript does not identify who moved or seconded the motion by name on the public record, nor does it include further public discussion of the substantive issues to be considered in the closed session. The statutes cited on the record were recorded verbatim as in the transcript; the board did not provide additional detail about which specific cases or personnel matters would be discussed publicly.
