Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Recommendation sent to Middleton City Council to approve police collective bargaining agreement, subject to attorney review
Summary
A meeting working group recommended the Middleton City Council approve the proposed collective bargaining agreement with the Middleton Professional Police Association, contingent on city attorney review and edits to Section 10.3A; the transcript shows a voice vote in favor but does not record a roll-call tally.
A working group recommended that the Middleton City Council approve the proposed collective bargaining agreement between the city and the Middleton Professional Police Association, subject to review and approval by the city attorney.
"The recommended motion would be to recommend to the city council approval of the proposed collective bargaining agreement between the city of Middleton and Middleton Professional Police Association, subject to city attorney review and approval," the city administrator said while reading the proposed motion text.
The recommended motion, as read, also called for removing what the city administrator described as "archaic language related to definitions of family members in section 10.3A" and for "adding applicable step-relatives"; the transcript contains a truncated or unclear phrase immediately after that portion and does not record further detail on those edits.
A committee member said, "yes I'll make that motion," and another committee member said, "I'll second that." The chair called for those in favor to say "I," and a voice vote was recorded as in favor. The transcript does not include a roll-call vote or a numerical tally, and no individual mover or seconder names are recorded in the transcript.
A participant noted there were no new agenda items but referred a future discussion on state and collective purchasing to be prepared for a subsequent agenda. The chair then adjourned the meeting.
Next steps specified in the motion were review and approval by the city attorney and referral of the recommendation to the city council for final action; the transcript does not record a subsequent city council vote or the city attorney's written approval.
Notes on record quality: the transcript includes an apparent truncation and at least one unclear word (transcribed as "Briement"); where language in the transcript is unclear, this article flags the ambiguity rather than paraphrasing or inventing specifics.
