Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Highway topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dunn County highway committee awards bids for trucks, asphalt, sealcoat, pulverizing, markings and materials

Dunn County Highway Committee · April 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved multiple procurement actions including acceptance of a $3,200 tariff on truck chassis to keep delivery on schedule, awards for asphalt and seal-coat materials, pulverizing and pavement marking contracts, culvert purchases, and aggregate providers for two road projects.

The Dunn County Highway Committee voted May 8 to approve a slate of procurement awards and an adjusted unit price for three truck chassis, taking a series of motions that will move vendor awards and a price-change recommendation to implementation.

On vehicle procurement, staff told the committee an invoice from the truck manufacturer (International) added a $3,200 tariff to the previously accepted low bid for three 2026 truck chassis. Staff recommended accepting the tariff-cost increase to avoid rebidding and further delivery delay; the committee approved the adjusted price.

The committee also awarded supply and construction contracts recommended by staff:

- Asphalt materials: Monarch Paving Company was the sole bidder; staff recommended and the committee accepted Monarch’s proposal despite modest increases in price from last year (staff estimated about $1.50–$2.00/ton higher).

- Seal-coat oil and application: Based on unit pricing staff recommended Flint Hills and Farner Asphalt for seal-coat application and MIG for CRS-2 oil pickup; the committee approved those awards.

- Pulverizing: HS & Suns offered the low bid for pulverizing existing asphalt roadways (option one) and the committee approved that award; staff noted a water-injection pulverize option exists but carries higher cost.

- Pavement marking: Staff recommended Farner Asphalt for standard waterborne paint and Sentry Traffic for an epoxy trial (epoxy is costlier but may last multiple years on new pavement); the committee approved the standard paint contract and an epoxy trial section.

- Culverts: Metal culvert unit prices varied between bidders; staff recommended Metal Culverts Inc. for steel culverts and Ferrell Equipment for HDPE/plastic culverts; motions to accept both recommendations passed.

- Aggregate/base materials: For County Road I staff recommended using a nearby Hos quarry to reduce haul distance and avoid a posted bridge; for County Road C, staff recommended Milestone to balance price and hauling convenience. Both recommendations were approved.

In each case staff emphasized both unit price and hauling logistics; several bidders who were lowest on per-ton price were not selected because longer haul distances would materially raise project costs. Committee members also raised schedule and equipment-availability concerns; staff warned that rebidding items (for example the truck chassis) could delay deliveries by a year and potentially increase total costs.

All procurement votes were recorded as approved by the committee; individual vote tallies were not read aloud for every item, but a small number of individual motions recorded isolated oppositions during other agenda items.