Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Service Grants topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Jacksonville council carves out microgrant pot after tense debate over PSG spending

Jacksonville City Council · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a lengthy floor debate, Jacksonville City Council adopted an amendment to next year’s Public Service Grants allocation to create a 3% microgrant category, drawing objections from PSG staff who urged a carryover of $200,000 already allocated for microgrants in the current fiscal year.

Jacksonville City Council on March 24 approved an amendment to the Public Service Grants (PSG) allocation for fiscal 2027 that creates a microrant (microgrant) category funded by reducing each of the three existing PSG category percentages by 1% (3% total).

The vote followed hours of exchanges in which council members and grants staff disputed whether the microrant program should be funded in FY27 or whether the $200,000 the council had set aside in the current fiscal year should be carried forward and used once PSG staff had the bandwidth to implement a small-grant program.

Council Member Boland argued the PSG council had planned to run a microrant program but had been asked to pause implementation and recommended carrying the current $200,000 forward for use next year. Barabell Figueroa, chief of Grants and Contract Compliance, told council the PSG council did not request adding a permanent Category D in the FY27 allocation because the council had intended to zero-base the category and did not want PSG program dollars reduced; she said PSG staff and the PSG council preferred to use this year’s set-aside and resume the microrant program next fiscal year.

Supporters of the amendment, including Council Member Aras and others, said the council had already committed funding for microgrants during budget hearings and that the city should move forward now. “We did our part during the budget process. We peeled off $200,000 specifically for this,” Council Member Aras said, arguing the council had the authority to set priorities and should not wait.

Opponents cautioned that administering many small awards creates additional work for grants staff and can increase oversight costs. Council Member Paluso pointed out prior policy choices aimed at limiting small direct appropriations and expressed concern about overburdening the grants office. PSG staff estimated typical microgrants at $10,000–$20,000; they warned that smaller awards require substantially more administration than larger awards.

After a hand/voice call for the question, the council approved the amendment and then passed the ordinance as amended. The final roll-call on the amended measure was entered as 16 yays, one nay and one abstention on record for the related PSG ordinance passage.

What happens next: The amendment sets the percentage allocation for PSG categories in the FY27 budget framework; actual dollar amounts will depend on the mayor’s and council’s final FY27 PSG appropriation. PSG staff and council members signaled they will work to manage the implementation timeline and administration of any microgrant category adopted.

Votes at a glance: Council adopted the PSG allocation amendment and the related ordinance as amended. PSG staff stated the microrant program remains a planned service but recommended using this year’s $200,000 set-aside rather than reallocating FY27 percentages. Councilmembers who pressed for immediate implementation said they would monitor execution and support administrative adjustments as needed.