Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative opposes menstruation-education language, says 'Men cannot menstruate'
Summary
Representative Pierick opposed a resolution about menstruation education in public schools, objecting to 'gender affirming' language and stating, 'Men cannot menstruate. Men don't have cycles or periods,' and voted no; the remark prompted recorded opposition and reservations from several members.
During consideration of multiple standing committee reports, Representative Pierick rose in opposition to a measure that promotes education about menstruation in public education. He objected to the use of the phrase "gender affirming" in the resolution and said the language implies "men can menstruate," which he rejected.
Pierick stated on the floor: "That's not true. Men cannot menstruate. Men don't have cycles or periods. So, I'm voting no." His remarks were recorded as his reason for opposing the measure. The House proceeded to move through many standing committee reports; several members entered reservations, and the Clerk recorded "so ordered" or "no vote" for various items as the body advanced the agenda.
Context and next steps: The transcript records Pierick's objection and a recorded 'no' on the item; it does not include further floor debate resolving the language or a subsequent amendment. The measure was considered among a large batch of HSCR items; the transcript shows the House advanced numerous reports, many with members entering reservations or opposition.
