Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Land‑use actions taken May 12, 2026
Summary
Summary of motions and outcomes from the Hillsborough County BOCC Land Use meeting on May 12, 2026, including vacates, PD modifications, rezoning approvals and denials.
Get email alerts on the Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners recorded votes on a series of land‑use items on May 12, 2026. Below is a concise at‑a‑glance log of the formal actions taken during the meeting:
• Vacate petitions – V23‑0011 (Mission Village Phase 1): Approved (motion carried 7–0). Staff reported no department objections; petitioner plan to return area to acreage for future redevelopment. – V25‑0005 (Pulitzer Avenue): Approved (motion carried 7–0). Petitioner granted easements to TECO, Charter Spectrum and Frontier. – V25‑0014 and V26‑0010: Approved (votes recorded 6–0 and 7–0 respectively).
• PRS / PD minor modifications and site requests (selected) – PRS 26‑0473 (Apollo Bay Cherry access modification): Approved 7–0. – PRS 26‑0505 (setback modification): Approved 7–0. – PRS 26‑044545 (multifamily buffering/screening): Approved 7–0. – PRS 26‑0612 (Keel Farms — parking/transportation conditions): Approved with amended condition removing hardened asphalt requirement (motion carried 7–0). – PRS 26‑0616 (Silva Academy soccer facility option): Approved 7–0; added option to reduce occupant count to 72 with one large field.
• Rezoning / major modifications – PD26‑0213 (the Yard, Boyette Road): Denied (motion carried 6–1). The board cited compatibility concerns with adjacent agricultural/residential uses. – MM26‑0346 (Parcel B — allow sit‑down restaurant with one drive‑through): Approved with conditions (motion carried 7–0). Applicant agreed to increased setback, an 8‑foot wall and restricted hours of operation. – PD25‑0383 (F1 — 10 townhomes on North Ola Avenue): Denied (motion carried 7–0) after public testimony about flooding and neighborhood character.
For recorded vote tallies and full motions see the official meeting record. Items with contested public testimony (PD26‑0213 and PD25‑0383) drew sustained public participation; other items were largely routine and passed unanimously.

