Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vocational Rehabilitation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vocational Rehabilitation officials outline eligibility priorities and waiting‑list practices
Summary
Office of Vocational Rehabilitation leaders described priority categories based on functional limitations, said financial participation and comparable benefits (including Medicaid) are considered, and reported additional federal funding this year while confirming waiting lists for some services.
Officials from the Education and Labor Cabinet's Office of Vocational Rehabilitation (OVR) told the subcommittee that updated regulations clarify priority categories and the application process for vocational rehabilitation services.
Cora McNabb, executive director of OVR, said priority categories are determined by functional limitations (self‑care, mobility, communication, work tolerance) rather than means testing. Susie Edwards, deputy executive director, added that "comparable benefits" such as insurance or Medicaid are considered when determining services and that financial participation formulas are applied consistently.
Committee members asked whether expanded Medicaid benefits (dental, vision, hearing) would change which avenue families pursue; OVR staff said Medicaid and VR are both considered payers of first resort and that OVR will account for comparable benefits. When asked about budget changes, OVR told members it received additional federal funds this year but no new state dollars; some applicants remain on waiting lists.
The subcommittee approved staff amendments to the OVR regulatory package without objection. Members asked for clarification about how waiting lists are managed and were advised to encourage applicants to submit applications so eligibility and priority can be determined.
The item concluded with staff offering to follow up with additional detail on waiting‑list procedures and the application of comparable benefits.
