Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Council receives and files CRA report after administrator resigns, members warn projects at risk
Summary
The Los Angeles City Council on July 2 received and filed a report on the Community Redevelopment Agency after the agency's administrator resigned and multiple senior staff left, prompting concerns that pending redevelopment projects lack leadership and that the mayor's office should report back on replacement plans.
The Los Angeles City Council voted to receive-and-file a report on the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) after council members described the sudden resignation of the agency's administrator and the departure of senior staff.
Mr. Savorich moved to "receive and file item number 30," saying the departures left a leadership gap that threatened redevelopment efforts citywide. "The Community Redevelopment Agency ... is the agency that brings hope to communities across this city that are in most desperate need of it," he told the council and urged attention to the agency’s staffing and budget issues.
Council members described a rapid exodus of talent. Mr. Ridley Thomas said the loss of leaders had put projects "in limbo" and warned that projects in multiple council districts could be affected. Councilman Holden said he voted to receive and file the item "with regret," noting that the CRA had previously helped move inner-city economic-development plans forward and urging continuity so projects would not be set back.
Mr. Hernandez urged the mayor's office to report to the council on immediate plans to fill the leadership gap and suggested the deputy mayor for economic development be asked to brief the body. He said many pending projects, including Tax Increment Financing initiatives and development sites that rely on CRA involvement, need active oversight.
On roll call, the motion to receive and file item 30 passed with a recorded vote of "13 eyes." The council did not adopt a specific replacement at the meeting; members instead recorded the motion and requested follow-up reporting.
What happens next: council members asked for a report from the mayor's office and for clarity on short-term interim leadership so redevelopment projects can continue. The council recorded concern that project approvals, grant applications and economic-development activities tied to CRA oversight require immediate attention.
Provenance: transcript discussion began at SEG 928 and concluded with the vote at SEG 1214.
