Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vacate Order Building Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff issues immediate vacate order for deteriorating East Main building; preservation options discussed
Summary
Town staff issued an immediate vacate order for a structurally unsafe building on East Main Street after inspectors found a failing rear wall and mold; the Historic Preservation Commission discussed requiring an owner repair plan, a Board of Zoning Appeals hearing on April 27, and the risk of demolition by neglect.
Town of Newburgh historic preservation staff announced an immediate order to vacate a building on East Main Street after building inspectors identified serious structural and health hazards.
"I issued an order to vacate," staff member Riley told the Historic Preservation Commission, saying the notice was posted on the door the same day and the order prohibits anyone from entering the premises. Riley said the building’s rear wall was failing, additions contained significant mold and unsafe conditions, and a tenant occupied an upstairs apartment.
Commission members pressed staff on next steps and on how to compel remediation if the owner does not cooperate. Commissioners said the town will require the owner to submit a repair plan, contractor information and proof of funds if the owner proposes repairs. The commission also discussed the risk that an uncooperative owner could let the building continue to deteriorate — a condition members described as "demolition by neglect." A commission member summarized the dilemma: without owner cooperation, the town has limited tools to force a sale or repair, and past efforts to deal with neglect have had mixed results.
Riley said the Board of Zoning Appeals will hold a public hearing on April 27 to either appeal or confirm the vacate order; that hearing will be the next formal opportunity for the owner to present a plan or challenge the order. Commission members discussed whether a delegation from the commission should meet with the owner and agreed to monitor the BZA outcome and report back.
The commission emphasized preservation where feasible; staff noted the original main structure retains some integrity while later additions and decks are the greatest sources of instability and mold. The commission asked staff to return with options and timelines after the BZA hearing.
The commission did not take a formal vote on demolition or acquisition; the immediate action taken was the staff vacate order and a scheduled BZA hearing to resolve the owner’s response.
