Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Design topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pleasant Hill ARC approves requested McNeel house modifications, keeps double gable and extends belly band

Pleasant Hill Architectural Review Commission · February 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Pleasant Hill Architectural Review Commission unanimously approved revisions to a single-family residence at 256 Oak Park Lane on Feb. 19, allowing the applicant to retain a double gable over the front porch and to extend a horizontal 'belly band' toward the front façade, with staff’s recommended conditions and an SQA exemption.

The Pleasant Hill Architectural Review Commission on Feb. 19 approved requested design modifications for a single-family house at 256 Oak Park Lane, allowing the applicant to keep a double gable over the front porch and to extend a decorative belly band toward the front elevation.

Staff opened the public hearing by summarizing the project and noting that the ARC previously conditioned the design at a Jan. 15, 2026 hearing to simplify the double gable over the porch. Staff said the applicant sought reconsideration so the homeowner could keep the front door centered beneath one gable. The staff presentation reviewed site plans, front elevations and color/material choices and recommended the commission accept the SQA exemption and consider the applicant’s requested modification to the prior conditions of approval.

Applicant designer Jackie Mendes said the simplified roofline proposed after the January meeting altered the porch’s primary visual feature. "The front door does not change in location between the two options," Mendes said, and centering the porch framing with the door made the centered gable important to the homeowner’s design intent. She also said continuing the belly band around the front, given the chosen trim color, visually aligns the fascia and single-story roofline.

Commissioners discussed visual and maintenance trade-offs. Several commissioners supported extending the belly band, calling it a positive visual detail. Commissioners also debated the double gable: some described it as busier or potentially awkward from a roadside view, while others said centering the door and the homeowner’s preferences justified keeping the double gable. Commissioners asked to see floor plans and 3-D views to confirm the interior entry that creates the higher gable.

Following discussion, a motion to approve the requested modification — to continue the belly band and allow the proposed double gable — was made, seconded and approved on a unanimous roll call (Commissioners Brandis, Kapor, Weir and Chair Sher Nelson recorded 'yes'). The commission recorded the approval subject to the attached conditions of approval and any modifications the ARC directed during the meeting.

The commission closed the public hearing with no members of the public speaking. The applicant and staff were told the city would follow up with next steps; no additional formal actions were reported at the meeting.

Next steps: staff will finalize the decision paperwork and communicate conditions to the applicant.