Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Equipment Purchase topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public works asks board to approve early $300,000 MowerMax purchase to replace aging tractor setup

Cowlitz County Board of County Commissioners · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public works staff told commissioners the county should buy a MowerMax mowing system now instead of waiting two years, citing repeated maintenance and boom failures on a converted John Deere; staff asked to use reserves to cover an estimated $290,000 price and requested $300,000 to cover shipping and taxes.

COWLITZ COUNTY — County public-works staff asked the board to approve an early replacement of an aging tractor-mounted mowing system with a MowerMax attachment, presenting maintenance history and budget implications.

Public Services staff said the existing John Deere tractors and long-reach boom heads have required frequent repairs and replacements and that recent repair estimates make buying a new MowerMax more economical than continuing to repair converted equipment. Staff described the MowerMax as “built for that” work and noted other jurisdictions' adoption of the system.

Staff requested $300,000 from reserves to cover the new units (staff quoted a $290,000 base price including shipping and taxes and asked for a $10,000 contingency). County staff said the mower pool reserves total about $400,000, and the request would be an early withdrawal from that reserve rather than a budgeted replacement this year.

Why it matters: Purchasing the MowerMax would aim to reduce ongoing maintenance costs and equipment downtime for right-of-way and roadside vegetation management. Staff also suggested surplusing older tractors to provide reduced-cost equipment to the fairgrounds and other county partners.

Board members generally signaled openness to the approach but did not vote at the meeting; staff said they would provide additional cost details and the board would consider the request in a future budget or consent item.