Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council deadlocks 4–4 on proposed golf-course fee schedule after extended debate
Summary
After lengthy discussion about cart fees, membership prices and youth-play rules, the council tied 4–4 on Resolution 2026-21 and the proposed 2026 golf fee schedule failed; staff will return with more comparative data and options for youth access.
The Little Falls City Council debated proposed changes to the 2026 golf-course fee schedule on March 16 and ended in a 4–4 tie, so the resolution failed and the current fees remain in place.
Alex, a city staff member who presented the schedule with the golf superintendent Paul and others, said the proposed document "has not actually changed the amount on any of these particular items" but adds clarifying items such as club rental and year-round cart storage and formalizes a young-adult category (18–24).
The bulk of the meeting's discussion focused on perceived fairness of seasonal cart-pass and storage fees, how Little Falls' rates compare with nearby courses, and whether the council should expand youth access. One council member renewed a proposal to allow youth to play for free without a paying adult provided they complete a brief safety/etiquette course; supporters said that could grow future memberships, while opponents warned free play could reduce revenue and place supervisory burdens on course staff.
Several council members asked staff for a clear comparison chart of Little Falls' rates versus neighboring courses and for options that would protect course revenue while increasing youth access. A roll-call vote on Resolution 2026-21 split 4–4 (yes 4, no 4), and the resolution therefore failed.
Council members who opposed the resolution asked colleagues who voted "no" to meet with staff to draft alternative proposals; staff said it will return with comparative fee data and more detailed recommendations before the season began.
