Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Environment Trees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission approves two multi‑tree removal proposals, requires stump grinding for redwoods

Nevada City Planning Commission · March 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved tree‑removal permits for 397 Gracie Road (14 trees, including seven redwoods) and 175 Ridge Road (Sierra Presbyterian, 13 trees), citing structural hazards, overcrowding and proximity to infrastructure; commissioners required stump grinding for redwoods adjacent to the sidewalk.

The Nevada City Planning Commission approved two separate tree‑removal applications after hearing arborist evidence and public discussion over tree health, public safety and neighborhood aesthetics.

At 397 Gracie Road, arborist testimony presented by Jim Norman of Jim Norman's Trees Unlimited described 14 trees proposed for removal — including seven redwoods, pines and cedars — that were lifting sidewalks and driveways and showing root‑zone cracking. Norman said some trees had double tops and structural weaknesses that increased the risk of failure during storms. Commissioners discussed replacement planting and the long‑term aesthetics of removing a large grouping of redwoods. The commission approved the removal and added a condition that redwood stumps adjacent to the sidewalk must be ground to limit resprouting.

At 175 Ridge Road, Daniel Ketchum represented Sierra Presbyterian Church in a request to remove eight ponderosa pines and five incense cedars across parcels totaling roughly 3.75 acres. The city's forester documented overcrowding, root competition and signs of decline; commissioners also noted several trees near PG&E lines that the utility would evaluate. The commission found the project categorically exempt under SEQA and approved the removal as presented.

Both approvals included standard conditions for permits and referenced forester and arborist reports filed with staff. Commissioners encouraged applicants to consider replanting with species better suited to the site and to include remediation or planting plans if future applications propose further removals.

Next steps: Applicants and contractors will schedule removal work consistent with city permit conditions and required stump grinding where specified.