Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After heated public hearing, North Ogden council annexes 11.768 acres and approves development agreement with limits on basements, sidewalks and private streets
Summary
Following hours of public comment and debate, the council approved annexation of 11.768 acres at 1978 N 1150 E to R‑18 and adopted a development agreement limiting the project to 44 lots (min. 8,000 sq ft), requiring sidewalks on the outer edge, prohibiting driveways onto 925 E, and banning full basements; the vote was 4–1.
The North Ogden City Council approved an ordinance to annex about 11.768 acres at 1978 North 1150 East into city limits with a zoning designation of R‑18 and adopted a companion development agreement after a lengthy public hearing and robust council debate.
City Recorder Ryan Santoro summarized procedural steps and Scott Hess, the city’s community and economic development director, said the planning commission recommended R‑18 with a development agreement. The development agreement presented to the council limited the subdivision to a maximum of 44 single‑family lots, each at least 8,000 square feet, and included provisions to protect walkability and emergency access.
Developer Derek Terry (Albion Development Partners) told the council the concept plan had been revised downward from earlier iterations and that the product is intended to match the character of adjacent Ward Farms and Fernwood neighborhoods. Terry and staff said private interior streets built to city standards would save the city long‑term maintenance costs while placing road upkeep on a homeowners association.
Residents filled the public‑comment period with concerns. Speakers said smaller private roads and single‑side sidewalks could impede emergency access, reduce parking, and create long‑term maintenance costs for future residents. Several called for a guaranteed pocket park, deed restrictions for owner‑occupancy or preferred‑buyer programs, and stronger language in the development agreement to memorialize promises the developer made in earlier meetings.
Council discussion focused on balancing the developer’s site constraints with neighbors’ safety and amenity concerns. Council members negotiated agreement language during deliberations that included:
- Maximum of 44 dwellings at a minimum of 8,000 sq ft per lot; - Front-yard setback of 20 feet (with an option for garage setback rules); - Sidewalks required on the outer edge of the neighborhood to ensure pedestrian connectivity to adjacent areas; - No driveways directly onto 925 East; - Homes to be offered for sale and marketed as owner‑occupied (development agreement language, not a perpetual deed restriction tying title); - If a garage is set less than 25 feet from the curb, an RV pad is required to reduce on‑street obstructions; - No full basements allowed in the development, to reduce flood/sump‑pump risk raised by residents.
The council first voted to consider a motion that made the annexation contingent on an agreed development agreement. Councilmember Watson’s motion that made R‑18 approval contingent on an agreed development agreement prevailed over a competing motion. The final votes on the annexation plus development agreement passed 4–1. Councilmember Dalpez voted no; Councilmembers Naber, Carney, Pulver and Watson voted yes.
What it means: The approval allows the developer to move forward under the R‑18 zone and the specific development‑agreement terms the council adopted. The development agreement sets the negotiated parameters staff and the developer must follow when the detailed engineering and final plat return to staff and the planning commission for administrative and design review.
"We wanted to be clear that the maximum density was part of the agreement," Scott Hess said during deliberations. "If the council wants no basements or owner‑occupied language, it should be included in the DA, and it is."
