Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate narrowly concurs on 'Shield Act' after debate over federal SAVE checks and voter burdens
Summary
Senate concurrence for SB 2588, the 'Shield Act,' passed after debate over requiring the Secretary of State to check certain registrations against DPS and the federal SAVE database; opponents warned repeated checks could wrongly burden longtime voters without DPS records.
The Mississippi Senate voted to concur with House changes to Senate Bill 2588 — titled in the transcript as the "Safeguard Honesty and Integrity in Elections for Lasting Democracy (Shield) Act" — after extended floor debate over use of the federal SAVE database and possible impacts on voters.
Sponsor Senator England described the bill as a measure to ensure registered voters are U.S. citizens by cross-checking the statewide voter file against Department of Public Safety (DPS) records and the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database in specified circumstances. England said the House made only "minor" changes and invited questions.
Senator Blunt moved to decline to concur and to invite conference, arguing the bill's requirement for an annual cross-check against DPS and SAVE could repeatedly burden voters who lack DPS information (for example, elderly voters who do not drive) and risk unnecessary mailings and paperwork. "If your name is not in that database, you should not be put at risk of being purged," Blunt said, urging the Senate to send the measure to conference to fix technical language.
Senator Sparks questioned whether the SAVE database — created to verify entitlement eligibility — was designed to support statewide voter-roll cross-checks. Senators discussed that noncitizen voting is a felony under state law and that SAVE is a federal benefit-verification system rather than a voters list. Senator DePriest pressed on how many cases of noncitizen voting have been identified in Mississippi; Blunt said he was not aware of any such cases and warned of the greater risk of wrongful purges than proven incidents of noncitizen voting.
Senator England closed debate saying clerks could note errors and the Secretary of State could adopt rules to limit harm; he also said the Secretary of State would report how many people were flagged and how many were removed under the system. After roll call, the Senate recorded concurrence with the House changes by a vote recorded in the transcript as 31 yes to 16 no.
The bill requires the Secretary of State to use DPS and, where applicable, the federal SAVE database in specified verification steps; the transcript records concerns about the operational effects on voters who lack DPS records, the annual nature of the check, and procedural safeguards the Secretary of State might adopt.
