Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Garage Finances topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

West Chester parking garages report $169,049 net income for March

West Chester Parking Committee · April 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Colonial Parking reported March garage revenues of $233,736, operating expenses of $64,686 and a net income of $169,049; staff noted year-to-date numbers slightly below budget and a dip in Chestnut Street transient revenue while Bicentennial garage hit Friday peaks.

Colonial Parking presented March performance figures to the West Chester Parking Committee showing total garage revenues of $233,736, operating expenses of $64,686 and a net income of $169,049 for the month.

Chris Henkins of Colonial Parking told the committee the March net income was slightly higher than budget for the month, and year-to-date net operating income stood slightly below the year-to-date budgeted amount ($519,71X reported versus $529,576 budgeted). Henkins also reported 1,005 contract parkers in March, an average combined transient revenue figure and an average combined tickets-per-day count of 932 for March, with the Chestnut Street garage showing a dip in transient revenue compared with the prior year.

Henkins pointed to event impacts and specific peak days: the "No Kings" rally on March 28 generated 514 transient parkings between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m.; a March 6 peak at the Chestnut Street garage saw 172 parkers between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.; the Bicentennial garage peaked on March 4 between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. Committee members asked staff to report how often garages are full; Henkins said Bicentennial fills frequently on busy Fridays while Chestnut Street rarely fills in normal months.

Staff agreed to compile month-by-month fill-frequency data and provide a follow-up showing how often signage reports "full" corresponded to actual capacity limits. The committee did not take any formal action on financials; members used the report to flag operational questions about Friday/Saturday peak capacity and to request additional occupancy/fill-rate data.