Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council presses code enforcement over repeat offenders, cites limits of current fines and court process
Summary
Harriman council and code enforcement discussed repeat property‑maintenance violators, the city’s 10‑day notice and $50/day fine practice, judges’ role in fines, failure‑to‑appear enforcement gaps and options including liens or city cleanups to recover costs.
Council members used the March 3 meeting to press code‑enforcement staff about repeat property‑maintenance violators and whether the city has effective remedies when cited residents fail to appear in court.
Nathan, who presented the enforcement report, said overall response to requests has been good but acknowledged several repeat cases and three currently open repeat‑offender files. He described the typical process: a certified notice of violation is mailed; the property owner has 10 days to comply; if not, a citation is issued and the matter proceeds to the judge. The judge, Nathan said, is the authority who sets fines; historically the cases cited were charged at about $50 per day pending compliance.
Council members and staff flagged a practical enforcement gap when respondents fail to appear for court. "If they don't come to court, nothing happens," one council member said during the exchange, and the group discussed whether failure‑to‑appear notices and subsequent assessment of fines are being applied consistently. Staff described that the judge’s office sends a failure‑to‑appear notice and that, after the court date, the penalty assessment (commonly $50/day) begins and the city can put the property out for bid for cleanup and attach a lien to recover costs.
Council sought additional legal options to increase the enforcement impact on repeat offenders, including clarifying whether multiple citations can be issued, escalation of penalties, and putting names and cases on a public board as a transparency tool. Staff noted concerns about safety (sending crews to occupied properties) and the need to follow legal procedures when attaching liens or performing cleanups.
Council asked staff to return with a report that lays out what remedies are legally available and best practices for escalating enforcement against persistent violators, including options for streamlining case handling and tracking repeat offenders in monthly reports.
