Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Substitute Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves Kelly substitute contract, members warn of impact on in‑house "priority" subs
Summary
The Independence School District board approved contracting with Kelly Education for substitute services, citing potential improvements to a current ~70% fill rate and projected district savings; board members raised concerns about roughly 55 'priority subs' who currently fill building roles and the equity of transitioning them to an external service.
The Independence School District Board of Education voted to contract with Kelly Education to provide substitute services after administrators recommended the change to improve substitute coverage and realize savings.
Dr. Sha, presenting the administration's recommendation, said the district’s current substitute fill rate is about 70 percent and that neighboring districts using Kelly report fill rates in the 80–86 percent range. Administration presented a contract cost figure during the meeting and argued the change could free funding for other staffing priorities. Administration also noted an estimated conservative savings “about $500,000” tied to transitioning away from the district’s priority‑sub program; that figure was cited in the meeting by Dr. Hurl.
Brandy of Kelly Education answered questions from the board about how the service works, explaining that teachers can place an absence and assign a preferred substitute when they have previously arranged one: “You would have the ability as a teacher to go in and put in your absence and assign whoever you would like,” Brandy said.
Board members pressed administration on the consequences for existing priority subs, a category of in‑building, year‑to‑year positions that provides consistent coverage and building integration. Administrators said there are slots for about 55 priority subs and that priority subs would be given the opportunity to transition to Kelly or to apply for other district positions; staff repeatedly noted that Kelly substitute roles would not be permanently assigned to a single building in the same way current priority subs are.
Several board members said that while improved coverage and potential savings are important, the loss of in‑building substitutes could hurt classroom continuity and staff morale. Administration responded that the contract includes benefits for workers who transition to Kelly and that the district would monitor the model and could revisit the structure after an initial period.
After discussion the board moved and approved the contract as presented.
What happens next: administration will execute the contract and work with HR to communicate transition options to priority subs; board members said they expect follow‑up reporting on fill rates, costs and staffing impacts.
