Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Bond Election topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Travis Unified board tables vote on November bond after legal Q&A; may call special meeting to meet county deadline

Travis Unified School District Governing Board · June 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees delayed a decision on placing a proposed facilities bond on the November ballot, citing the need for a full board and to confirm county filing deadlines; outside counsel advised on post-resolution campaign rules and committee fundraising protocols.

The Travis Unified School District governing board tabled a final vote on placing a proposed facilities bond on the November ballot after trustees raised concerns about quorum, community support and county filing deadlines.

Outside counsel Joselyn, present to answer legal questions, told the board there are clear rules about permissible communications after a resolution is passed and explained distinctions between actions taken in an official capacity and activity conducted in a campaign capacity. "There are certain guidelines that must be followed... after the resolution is passed," she said, and offered to provide the board and district staff written guidance about what is permissible and to advise on specific questions from groups such as PTOs and parent organizations.

Several trustees spoke in favor of the bond, laying out facility needs, potential benefits to home values and a plan for public outreach. One trustee said they would not support placing the bond on the ballot, citing prior failed attempts and concerns about fairness of parcel taxes and community priorities; that trustee stated, "I will not be supporting the bond measure." The board discussed whether they needed all five members present to proceed because a November placement requires a high approval threshold for a facilities bond at the county level.

Ultimately a motion to table the ballot decision until the board’s next meeting (with a first choice date of Tuesday the 18th) passed by the members present. Board leadership said they would check county deadlines and call a special meeting before the 18th if required to meet filing deadlines.

Next steps: staff and counsel will check the county ballot‑filing timeline, provide written guidance about permissible post-resolution activity, and coordinate availability for a possible special meeting to finalize the bond decision.