Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners ask planning staff for redlines, keep Destination 2050 open to more public comment

New Hanover County Board of Commissioners · April 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County planners briefed the board on the Destination 2050 comprehensive plan draft and commissioners asked for redline/side‑by‑side comparisons of recent edits, kept the public comment portal open and indicated they would not schedule a May public hearing pending those materials.

County planning staff gave an update on the Destination 2050 draft comprehensive plan at the April 6 meeting, summarizing public comments received since the February hearing and asking the board for direction on next steps.

Staff reported that four additional comments addressed housing affordability, workforce housing opportunities and community‑character protections such as tree retention and buffering. The draft contains policy guidance on transitions between uses, place types and infrastructure‑informed decisions; staff flagged issues where language or data need technical clarification.

Commissioners emphasized transparency and asked staff to produce a redline or side‑by‑side comparison showing changes since the earlier draft so the board and public can clearly see edits. Several commissioners said they did not want the board to rush to a second public hearing in May and instead preferred more time and periodic side‑by‑side updates so stakeholders can review revisions ahead of a scheduled hearing.

Staff said the public comment portal will remain open through the hearing process and that, depending on the magnitude of any requested policy changes, more analysis could be required and would affect the adoption timeline.

The board did not set a new hearing date and directed staff to bring the requested comparison documents and keep commissioners apprised of next steps.