Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hudson weighs salt‑dome relocation, incentive tools and sale strategy for 91‑acre Hines Hill site
Summary
Council discussed near-term needs to relocate a city salt dome (required prior to sale), potential incentive tools (enterprise zone vs. CRA), ownership options (sell, retain, P3) and whether to hire a broker or developer to market the JobsOhio‑certified 91‑acre Hines Hill Road site.
Staff updated council on key choices facing the city for the 91-acre Hines Hill Road site, including an operational constraint that staff said must be resolved before listing the most developable pad for sale: the city’s auxiliary salt dome sits on a prime pad and needs relocation.
Staff said they have evaluated alternative parcels, land-swap possibilities and county partnerships, and recommended a parcel just east/south of Hines Hill Road as the preferred relocation site. They said the salt-delivery window occurs in August and, to meet a 2026 construction target, the city should begin planning and take the project to Planning Commission in June.
On incentives, staff reviewed tools including Community Reinvestment Areas (CRA), enterprise zones and undeveloped-property abatements. Staff noted the site does not cleanly meet CRA criteria tied to nearby depressed properties but said Summit County expressed willingness to help pursue an enterprise-zone application if council wants to explore that incentive route.
Ownership and marketing options were discussed at length. Staff laid out three paths: sell the parcel outright to a developer, retain city ownership and market to end users (possibly via a P3), or engage a developer/broker to manage marketing and due diligence. Staff cautioned that a developer may have broader networks to recruit a large employer, while retaining city control provides more leverage over end uses. The site has JobsOhio certification and deed covenants limiting certain negative uses, which staff said give the city additional protections beyond zoning.
Council asked staff to return with further analysis, to engage counsel about possible executive-session discussions on sale mechanics, and to provide more detail on timelines and budget implications for salt-dome relocation and broker/developer costs.
