Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Ogden accepts FY24–25 audit; auditors note missing fraud-risk assessment
Summary
The council accepted the cityaudit for fiscal year 2024–25 after Finance Director Peter Brown and auditors summarized a clean (unmodified) opinion. Auditors flagged one Utah state legal-compliance finding: the city did not file the annual fraud risk assessment in June (staff presented it in January and agreed to correct the timing).
The North Ogden City Council voted to accept the FY24–25 audit after a presentation by Finance Director Peter Brown and the city's auditors.
"They expressed an unmodified opinion," Peter Brown summarized, describing the auditors' conclusion that the financial statements presented fairly in accordance with accounting standards. The auditors reported that planning and testing were performed without identifying any deficiencies rising to the level of a material weakness.
The audit included one state legal-compliance finding: the city did not file the annual fraud risk assessment at the June date required by state guidance. Brown said the assessment was presented in January 2026 but acknowledged the timing error and told the council staff will adopt steps to comply in future cycles.
Council members asked for and received explanations for several line-item variances in the government-wide financial statements: a roughly $600,000 increase in public-safety spending was explained largely by depreciation on the new public-safety building and accrual of compensated absences; a $1.6 million increase in fund balances was traced to timing and reporting differences and one-time revenue capture following turnover in the finance office. Brown told the council the fungible (unrestricted) surplus was about $500,000 after accounting for restricted funds.
Motion and outcome: council member Dalpaz moved to accept the audit as presented; council member Pulver seconded. The council approved the audit by voice vote (no recorded opposition). The audit acceptance will allow staff to finalize financial statements and proceed with any necessary corrective steps on the fraud-risk assessment timing.
Next steps: staff agreed to correct the filing timing for the fraud-risk assessment and to continue efforts to create clearer summaries (a "Rosetta Stone") that map internal accounting categories into the audit reports so council can more easily interpret year-to-year changes.
