Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Temperature Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Policy committee debates outdoor-temperature cutoffs for students, defers final ECC vote
Summary
Staff presented expanded temperature standards (Policy ECC) covering indoor spaces, vehicles and outdoor activities; committee members asked for more data on cutoffs (15°F vs. 13°F vs. 9°F wind-chill) and agreed to refine language and procedures before a vote.
Get email alerts on the Temperature Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dr. Sarah Warren told the policy committee on March 9 that proposed revisions to Policy ECC would expand temperature standards to include vehicles (buses and vans) and provide a separate section for outdoor thresholds, using guidance drawn from the American Academy of Pediatrics.
"The numbers here are taken from the American Association of Pediatricians," Dr. Warren said, explaining that the draft distinguishes indoor/vehicle limits from outdoor limits and that wind chill or heat index will be considered.
Committee members raised concerns about outdoor minimums, with some arguing that a 15°F cutoff could be stricter than current local practice (one school reportedly uses 13°F), while others noted that a cutoff near 9°F would be closer to a dangerous threshold. Members also pressed how the district would ensure students who lack appropriate clothing have access to donated gear.
Vice Chair Mickey Bondo said families had complained when children were kept inside during a cold week and asked whether recess specifically was included; Dr. Warren said the outdoor standard was intended to apply to recess and other outdoor activities.
Legal counsel Kathleen Wade said the state requires adoption of building-temperature minimums and the draft meets the statutory requirement; staff will develop implementing procedures (including expectations about gear and site discretion) with counsel support.
The committee agreed to collect additional benchmark data (including practices in other states and districts) and to return with refined language that emphasizes prioritizing outdoor time where safe while allowing site-level flexibility and clear procedures.
Next steps: Staff will compile comparative data points and proposed procedural language for a future meeting; the committee did not take a final vote on ECC at this session.

