Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission agrees to study feasibility of a county noise ordinance after residents' complaints
Summary
Commissioners discussed repeated resident complaints about loud music and bass in subdivided areas and asked staff to research enforceable noise-ordinance models used by other counties, equipment and training costs, and court-tested decibel limits.
Get email alerts on the Ordinance Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners raised recurring constituent complaints about loud music and low-frequency bass in subdivided areas and asked staff to research whether a county noise ordinance limited to subdivisions would be enforceable and practical.
Chief Deputy Holmes advised the panel that enforceable ordinances require specificity and measurement standards: "in order to make these types of ordinances enforceable, they have to be specific... usually measured in decibels." Holmes recommended staff determine decibel thresholds, equipment needs (decibel meters) and training for deputies and code-enforcement personnel and to examine ordinances other counties have used and defended in court.
Other commissioners expressed concern about the scope and unintended consequences of a countywide ordinance, noting potential conflicts with business activities and non-subdivision events; commissioners suggested focusing research on models that target subdivided residential areas and on examples where enforcement has withstood legal challenge.
The commission directed staff to research existing noise regulations, estimate equipment and training costs, and report back with options and examples used by counties that have successfully implemented enforceable standards.

