Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances adequacy-cost measure after debate over which services belong in the formula

House Education Committee · March 3, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Education Committee voted to advance HB1121 — defining the cost of an adequate education — as amended to simplify the statutory list of resource elements. Lawmakers debated whether items such as school nurses and periodic statutory reviews should be included in the adequacy formula.

The House Education Committee voted to advance HB1121, a bill to define the cost of an adequate education, after adopting a streamlined amendment to the bill's statutory list of resource elements.

Representative Vlad, the floor sponsor, told colleagues the measure aims to identify the ‘‘resource elements that comprise the base cost’’ and produce data necessary to calculate an average cost per pupil. ‘‘This is very important,’’ he said, urging the committee to move the bill forward.

The committee first considered amendment 0808H, offered as a technical re‑structure of the list of resource elements. Representative McGuire said 0808H ‘‘keeps the same list’’ as the original bill but removes prescriptive language that required periodic statutory review, arguing the reporting mandates had no effective enforcement: ‘‘I don’t believe in putting things into law that can’t be enforced,’’ McGuire said.

Opponents warned the amendment could remove built‑in mechanisms for updating the statute. Representative Luno noted that existing law calls for a regular review of resource elements ‘‘no less frequently than every 10 years,’’ and Representative Damon urged adding teeth to reporting rather than removing it.

The committee later rejected amendment 0995H, which would have explicitly enumerated resource elements referenced in court orders and required biennial cost updates; the roll call produced eight votes in favor and 10 against, and the motion failed. Supporters of 0995H said the amendment would have ensured items cited by the Rockingham Superior Court (including nursing services) were included and that costs were updated every two years; critics said the phrase ‘‘but not limited to’’ risked leaving the list open‑ended.

After debate, the committee approved an OTPA motion on HB1121 as amended by 0808H and placed the bill on the regular calendar. The committee record indicates members discussed that local districts would still be free to provide services such as school nurses but that those services would not be automatically included in the state’s adequacy cost formula unless the legislature later amended the statute.

The committee report will note the committee’s intent and the statutory changes; Representative Lab was designated to draft the majority report. The bill now moves forward to the next stage of the legislative process.