Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Text Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission adopts LDO text amendments to CBD fuel stations, buffer yards and floodplain rules
Summary
On March 10 the Minot Planning Commission approved a package of Land Development Ordinance amendments including allowing fuel stations in the central business district adjacent to principal arterials, modifications to buffer‑yard rules (reduced widths with alternative fencing/landscape options and exemptions for wide rights‑of‑way), new allowances for gravel overflow parking at parks, a cross‑reference about parking on grass, and FEMA‑recommended floodplain management updates.
The Minot City Planning Commission on March 10 approved a package of Land Development Ordinance (LDO) text amendments intended to address downtown services, buffering practicality and to align local code with FEMA best practices.
Staff proposed treating some small edits as a bundle and voting on two larger amendments individually. The commission approved three smaller edits by staff recommendation: a targeted allowance to permit fuel stations within the central business district (CBD) only where the site abuts a principal arterial (staff named Broadway and Berdick as the qualifying arterials), an explicit municipal‑code cross‑reference that prohibits parking on grass in residential zones, and a provision allowing gravel or less‑improved overflow parking for parks and open‑space uses under defined conditions to preserve park character and lower paving costs.
Commissioners asked whether allowing fuel stations in the CBD would harm downtown character; staff replied CBD design standards and pedestrian infrastructure requirements still apply and that the change was intended to bring two existing downtown stations into zoning compliance and to enable potential new convenience stores that rely on fuel sales. Staff also described lighting, sidewalk and signage standards that would remain in force.
The commission then considered an extensive rewrite of buffer yard requirements. Key elements adoptable under this amendment include: allowing a reduced buffer width (from 20 feet down to 10 feet) if a 100% opaque fence of at least six feet is provided; permitting a 50% deciduous/50% evergreen mix in some fencing scenarios; providing exemptions when a wide right‑of‑way (over 100 feet) separates uses; and special alternative buffering strategies for lots platted before July 1, 2013 where strict ribbon‑style buffering is infeasible. Staff said these adjustments aim to balance effective buffering with development feasibility on small lots while preserving landscaping requirements where practicable. The commission approved the buffer‑yard amendment unanimously.
Finally, staff presented floodplain management updates supplied to local jurisdictions by FEMA and the NFIP. Changes are largely terminology and technical updates (e.g., 'floodplain management' phrasing, DATM/FIRM references, duties for the city engineer, encroachment analysis requirements, manufactured‑home and RV standards, revised variance/appeal procedure and flood‑protected first‑floor guidance). Staff described the amendments as aligning local code to FEMA guidance and best practices; the commission adopted these changes unanimously.
All LDO amendments in this package were approved by unanimous roll call votes.
