Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Fund topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declines to shift stormwater utility to general fund; staff to simplify fee calculation
Summary
Staff briefed council on stormwater fee calculation and revenue (~$7.4M average) and said shifting the enterprise to the general fund would require roughly a 2.5‑mill increase; council indicated no desire to move stormwater from the fee‑based enterprise fund and asked staff to simplify the fee calculation and continue capital project work from the fund balance.
Beaufort County staff on March 10 reviewed the county’s stormwater utility fee — a parcel‑level charge based on equivalent residential units, impervious area and gross lot area — and explained the revenue picture and implications of moving the program into the general fund.
Staff said the stormwater utility collects roughly $7.4 million on average across recent fiscal years after disbursements to municipalities and estimated that preserving the stormwater utility’s revenue in the general fund would require an operating millage increase of roughly 2.5 mills at current values. Finance staff also noted the stormwater enterprise carries a substantial fund balance (staff cited approximately $12 million budgeted for projects) and that capital projects and maintenance are already planned or underway.
Council direction: several council members expressed the view that the current fee‑based, enterprise model is equitable (charges based on impervious area) and asked staff not to move the enterprise into the general fund. Staff said they will pursue a simplification of the fee calculation (KISS approach) to reduce complexity for property owners while maintaining the impervious‑area principle.
Project activity: staff described an active pipeline of drainage studies, design work and major capital projects (for example, Shell Point designs) and said the fund balance supports moving projects from study to construction in coming years. Staff noted some municipalities set different rates and that credits are available to HOA‑maintained stormwater best‑management practices, though those credits are administrative and do not operate as direct refunds to individual homeowners.
Ending: council asked staff to continue capital and maintenance work from the stormwater fund and to return proposed simplifications of the fee calculation for later review.
