Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Roosevelt County safety committee asks for modest budget to buy air horns, signage and emergency supplies; commissioners table decision to May 30
Summary
The county safety committee requested a modest dedicated budget (about $1,318 estimated) for items such as air horns, handicap signage, door security devices and CPR equipment; commissioners agreed to consider the request during the May 30 special budget meeting.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tasha Gracel, chair of Roosevelt County’s safety committee and an employee in the assessor’s office, asked the commission to approve a small, dedicated safety budget to address recurring courthouse and county-facility needs.
Gracel said the courthouse lacks a modern fire-alarm system and currently relies on a single air horn and phone intercoms; the safety committee aims to run quarterly fire drills and requested a pack of air horns as an interim measure. The committee also proposed clearer handicap/elevator signage, active-shooter door-stop devices and CPR masks for departments and courthouse vehicles. Gracel estimated total initial needs at about $1,318.
Commissioners discussed alternatives, including creating a central safety line item, adding department-level safety allocations or buying in bulk and charging departments proportionally. County staff suggested some signage costs might be covered by ADA budgets or road-department funds; the county manager and finance staff also explained purchasing and accounting implications for using department procurement cards.
Several commissioners noted the committee has existed for years and that a modest fund for lower-cost safety items could speed implementation of low-cost safety measures that otherwise stall while staff pursues grants for larger projects. After discussion, a motion was made and seconded to table the safety-committee budget item and revisit it at the May 30 special budget meeting so the committee’s request can be considered alongside final budget decisions.
The commission did not approve a separate safety budget at the meeting; the item will return to the commission during the May 30 budget hearing with additional cost and funding-source recommendations.

