Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mount Clemens plans early lead testing of 30 homes and schedules Grasset Avenue corridor open house

Mount Clemens City Commission · May 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff said Mount Clemens will retest 30 homes for lead in drinking water this spring (one year earlier than scheduled) and announced a public open house on the Grasset Avenue Corridor project for March 30 at the Collaborative; the administration said good past test results inform the schedule and that a November millage request could follow if the project advances.

The Mount Clemens City Manager told the commission the city will conduct lead testing of water in spring 2016 for 30 homes that were part of prior sampling, moving the test up one year to provide residents earlier reassurance.

The city is on a three‑year sampling cycle based on consistently strong test results. The administration said the cost of doing the tests one year early was affordable and that testing at the correct seasonal time in spring yields more meaningful results than testing immediately. City staff said results will be shared with residents when testing is completed.

Separately, the administration announced an open‑house public meeting on the Grasset Avenue Corridor project—described as a study that could consider rapid‑transit elements—scheduled for Wednesday, March 30, from 4 to 7 p.m. at the Collaborative, 21 North Main Street in Mount Clemens. Staff said project proponents may discuss a millage ask if the project moves forward; that potential would be part of future public conversations and any ballot timing would be determined later.

Commissioners encouraged public attendance at the March 30 meeting and described it as an opportunity to view visual plans and speak with project staff and consultants.

No formal action or commitment of funding was made on either topic at the meeting.