Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sheriff Salary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff explain bill to set sheriff's base pay at $149,000
Summary
County staff briefed commissioners on House Bill 410, a state proposal to uncouple sheriff pay from judges' salaries and set a base salary of $149,000 with future cost-of-living adjustments; staff said the measure aims to simplify calculations that have produced retroactive pay adjustments under prior interpretations.
Get email alerts on the Sheriff Salary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Drew, a county staff member, told the Limestone County Commission at its work session that House Bill 410 would remove the sheriff's pay from a formula tied to judges' salaries and instead set a fixed base salary of $149,000, with the sheriff eligible for the same cost-of-living increases given to county employees.
He said the current systemhas produced complex calculations, retrospective adjustments and even repayments in some cases after changes in judge pay. "It would uncouple the sheriff's pay from any kind of judge's salary or any other officer, and would set it at a certain amount, which is $149,000," he said.
Under the bill as presented to the commission, the sheriff would accumulate cost-of-living adjustments but, consistent with constitutional limits on altering pay during a term, the recalculation would take effect when the officeholder's next term began. Drew emphasized the measure was intended to simplify administration and help the office keep pace with inflation.
The bill had passed one chamber and was in committee as of Feb. 26, according to staff; Drew cautioned that the text remains subject to amendment. Commissioners discussed the history of the county's local law that once tied sheriff pay to the highest-paid circuit judge and noted an attorney-general opinion had created interpretive confusion in the past. Several commissioners expressed support for the measure in concept and asked whether a county resolution supporting the bill was necessary, since the measure had already advanced in the legislature.
Next steps: county staff said the resolution in support could remain on the regular meeting agenda for commissioners to consider; the bill itself is subject to further legislative action and possible amendments at the state level.

