Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County board discusses updating wind/solar zoning and whether to study standalone battery storage
Summary
After a Springfield briefing on green‑energy rules, Edgar County board members agreed to gather sample ordinances and consider whether to formally explore zoning updates for battery storage; members noted state rules limit local authority and said standalone battery projects currently have weak economics.
Board members who attended a Springfield briefing on green‑energy regulation told the study session they are more informed and that the board should consider whether to update local wind and solar rules and whether to explore zoning for standalone battery energy‑storage systems.
"We got more education. We're more knowledgeable than we were," one board member said, and members asked staff to gather sample ordinances. Attendees noted that state law can preempt local zoning in certain energy matters and that zoning gives only narrow local tools such as decommissioning requirements.
An attorney and a board member said standalone battery projects are currently uncommon locally and that the economics for standalone storage at scale are weak; more likely are paired solar‑plus‑storage projects. The discussion also touched on emergency‑response concerns for projects sited in remote townships with limited volunteer fire capacity.
Members agreed to have staff and the planning official prepare an overview of options, likely costs for drafting ordinances and sample language from other counties so the board can make a formal decision on whether to proceed with a zoning study.
